Marriage, is what it is


                                                     Marriage is what it is

 In my class this week we read the summary of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Gay marriage in 2015. I found the paper written by the Supreme Court Justices fascinating. I am for traditional marriage, but I liked reading arguments for both sides because it helped me understand the view point of those who I don’t agree with. If we are kind to those people who don’t   agree with us, they are more likely to listen to us without hostily and with  understanding.  Alexander Dushku compared the traditional marriage fight with those who are pro-life. In a world where the majority is pro-choice, those who are pro-life are treated with respect and not as out casts in society. He said if those who are pro traditional marriage want to be treated with respect and not  as   out casts like those who are racist we must act with dignity and decorum when we defend our  views on marriage.(1) I believe that we could possibly  change someone’s   mind or at least help them understand our view point, if we are kind and articulate.  When we are rude  we have almost no chance. One of my favorite quotes is " In a world when you can choose to be anything choose to be kind"
I think one of the most compelling arguments against same sex marriage is the threat to the liberty of churches and organizations who are pro-traditional marriage. Now that same -sex marriage is legal religions and other organizations may face legal retributions. For example, a school that has housing for married students might be forced to open it up to same-sex couples or face law-suites and legal fines. Liberty and freedom have long been defined as freedom from government inference not entitlement to government benefits. (2) When the supreme court overruled what states have decided, through their democratic process, what their definition of marriage is, they took away liberty.  Letting nine lawyers change the definition of marriage when it has been defined as a union between a man and women since the beginning of time seems ridiculous. Marriage has always been a means to ensure that people procreate and that children will grow up in a family with a mom and a dad who are committed to each other. Children need the influence of both sexes, they need to be close to both. They learn different things from each parent. When a same sex couple adopts a child or has a baby through a surrogate or sperm donor they are denying children of having a mom and dad. The children of same sex couple won’t be miserable they will probably love both their parents and be happy, but they will still feel a void in their live. Katy Faust a child of a lesbian couple wrote a letter to Justice Kennedy explaining why she was against same sex marriage. She said
.
When two adults who cannot procreate want to raise children together, where do those babies come from? Each child is conceived by a mother and a father to whom that child has a natural right. When a child is placed in a same-sex-headed household, she will miss out on at least one critical parental relationship and a vital dual-gender influence. The nature of the adults’ union guarantees this. Whether by adoption, divorce, or third-party reproduction, the adults in this scenario satisfy their heart’s desires, while the child bears the most significant cost: missing out on one or more of her biological parents.
Making policy that intentionally deprives children of their fundamental rights is something that we should not endorse, incentivize, or promote.
Talk to any child with gay parents, especially those old enough to reflect on their experiences. If you ask a child raised by a lesbian couple if they love their two moms, you’ll probably get a resounding “yes!” Ask about their father, and you are in for either painful silence, a confession of gut-wrenching longing, or the recognition that they have a father that they wish they could see more often. The one thing that you will not hear is indifference.
What is your experience with children who have divorced parents, or are the offspring of third-party reproduction, or the victims of abandonment? Do they not care about their missing parent? Do those children claim to have never had a sleepless night wondering why their parents left, what they look like, or if they love their child? Of course not. We are made to know, and be known by, both of our parents. When one is absent, that absence leaves a lifelong gaping wound.(3)


The arguments for same -sex marriage were  heart wrenching. Same-sex couples wanted to have their union acknowledged, they wanted their children to be able to be adopted by both spouses to give them security, they wanted to travel from state to state and have their union acknowledged by each state. Their arguments are compelling, but what they want whether they realize it or not, is to take away rights from others. In my opinion the best way to have handled these issues that were brought up, would have been to allow them many of the benefits that married couples enjoy, tax laws and insurance laws could be have been changed. Same-sex couples would still have protection without changing the definition of what marriage is and what it has been since the beginning of time. Marriage is not just for the happiness of the man and women and it is for children too, it is for society, society functions best when children are raised in homes with a father and a mother who are married.
 As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I know that marriage has eternal significance. We know that families have the potential to be eternal, and that a man and a wife may have eternal increase in the world to come. Two men or two women cannot procreate so a union between the two isn't in line with God's plan of happiness for his children. God loves all his children no matter their views, or sexual orientation. We can love others while defending out faith, freedoms and believes.

1. Dushku, Alexander (July 7, 2015). The religious freedom implications of the Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage in Obergefell V. Hodges. Religious Freedom Annual Review (Conference), Brigham Young University. 
3. Faust, Katy (Febuary 2015) “ Dear  Justice Kennedy: Child of Gay parent”
Bottom of Form



Comments

Popular Posts